Eye in the Sky Scene 1 Shot log
Production
name
|
Galaxis
|
||
Director
|
Shane
Brocklehurst
|
Date
|
24/04/13, 26/05/13 and
08/05/13
|
Camera
Operator
|
Shane
Brocklehurst
|
Location
|
Manshead Upper School, B Block, Corridor and Locker area
|
Scene
|
Take
|
Duration
|
Description
|
Quality of video
(1=good, 3= poor)
|
Quality of audio
(1=good, 3= poor)
|
Usable (yes/no)
|
Notes
|
1B
Pt.1a
(00303)
|
1
|
0:07
|
This is the beginning of Scene 1B where Armendariz (Hit man) is
hacking in to the computer mainframe.
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was accurately filmed and I thought was quite an effective
technique of opening a scene as it showed the perspective of the character.
The mise en scene looked like an actual computer room and the audio of the
keyboard was quite clear which made this scene look dramatic.
|
1B
Pt.1b
(00305)
|
2
|
0:09
|
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This was practically the same as the first where the position of the
camera made the sequence look dramatic within the character, audio of
keyboard and the mise en scene while filmed in a medium shot (MS).
|
1B
Pt.2a
(00306)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This is the second part of Scene 1B showing the perspective of
Armendariz hacking the computer mainframe.
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene looked quite dramatic as it showed the perspective of the
character and his actions at hacking the computer mainframe. The audio of the
keyboard and the mise en scene created the theme of a crime thriller which
made the sequence look dramatic.
|
1B
Pt.2b
(00307)
|
2
|
0:06
|
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene also look dramatic as the camera position showed the
perspective and the actions of the hit man which made the scene look dramatic
along with the sounds of him typing on the key board. Although yes this scene
is usable but to me I do not think is has a good standard than the first
take.
|
1B
Pt.3a
(00309)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This is the third part where the Facility Security Guard points a
pistol at the Armendariz’s head.
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene looked quite dramatic to start off with but Facility
Security Guard pointed the gun at the Hit man’s head to quickly and the
dialogue of the character sounded it was rushed which made the scene look
unprofessional to include in the programme.
|
1B
Pt.3b
(00310)
|
2
|
0:07
|
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene looked much better than the first take as not only it
showed a good perspective of Armendariz hacking the computer it showed the
first good introduction of the Facility Security Guard which highlighted his
serious personality within his slow tone of voice which made it
understandable and therefore was definitely usable.
|
1B
Pt.4a
(00147)
|
1
|
0:07
|
This is the fourth part where Armendariz turns and faces the Facility
Security Guard.
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was perfectly filmed which presented the mise en scene of
the computer mainframe and the setting along with the green screen displayed
on the computer. The scene however illustrated the real character of
Armendariz introducing him as a dark confident villain. The part where the
hit man sighs is clear but he spoke quite fast, at least he said each word
clearly making the character stand out in the scene.
|
1B
Pt.4b
(00150)
|
2
|
0:06
|
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was more improved than the first take as it showed the
setting of the scene perfectly making the scene look dramatic. The audio of
the character was much better as he spoke slowly and clearly making him sound
more effective which illustrated the personality of the character.
|
1B
Pt.5a
(00152)
|
1
|
0:03
|
This is when Armendariz speaks back to the Facility Security Guard
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was quite effective as it showed the perspective of the
Facility Security Guard receiving the comment from the Hit man. Armendariz on
the other hand was also presented his personality that looked effective
within his posture with the gun pointed at his head and how he spoke.
|
1B
Pt.5b
(00153)
|
2
|
0:03
|
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was very much similar to the first take as it presented
the personality and perspective of both characters which again made the
sequence look dramatic.
|
1B
Pt.6a
(00154)
|
1
|
0:03
|
This is where the Facility Security Guard replies to first comment of
Armendariz
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was effective as it focused on the perspective of the
Facility Security Guard which introduced his personality along with his clear
dialogue which was understandable and looked quite dramatic
|
1B
Pt.6b
(00155)
|
2
|
0:04
|
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This was the second take which is usable but not as effective as the
first take as the camera slightly moves out of place towards the end. The
scene is still usable as it presents the perspective and the personality of
the Facility Security Guard effectively.
|
1B
Pt.7a
(00156)
|
1
|
0:03
|
This is the seventh scene where Zharkov (Antagonist) points his
pistol to the Facility Security Guard’s head.
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was quite effective as focused on the perspective of the
Facility Security Guard getting a gun pointed to his head by the antagonist
which creates that dramatic theme. This also illustrates the personality of
the antagonist which makes the individual look threating and powerful.
|
1B
Pt.7b
(00158)
|
2
|
0:04
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene does has the similar characteristics than the first take
but does not make the antagonist look threatening as he is smirking.
|
1B
Pt.8a
(00165)
|
1
|
0:05
|
This is when the Facility Security Guard slowly turns to face the
Antagonist pointing a gun at him
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene is quite effective from the angle it is being filmed from
as it shows a link of the antagonist pointing a gun at the Facility Security
Guard and the gun being pointed at the Hit man. The scene looks dramatic when
the Facility Security Guard turns his head slowly which he does to face
Zharkov. However the problem here is that when the Facility Security Guard
turns his head he turns his half his body around where he points the gun away
from Armenariz.
|
1B
Pt.8b
(00166)
|
2
|
0:04
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene is basically the same as the first take meaning we have
the re-film the sequence again.
|
1B
Pt.9a
(00)
|
1
|
0:03
|
This is the ninth scene where the antagonist responds to the Facility
Security Guard after he turns around to face him.
|
1
|
1
|
Yes
|
This is was the first take and the most effective as it showed the
perspective and the personality of the antagonist as a dark character
expressed from his posture, facial expression and his tone of voice which
made the scene look quite dramatic that relate to the theme/ setting and the
genre of the programme.
|
1B
Pt.9b
(00)
|
2
|
0:03
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene was not really effective as the antagonist was smirking
and his tone of voice sounded less threating and dark.
|
1B
Pt.9c
(00)
|
3
|
0:03
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
The third take was basically the same for the second take as the
personality of the character was not that dark to suit the characteristics of
the individual.
|
1B
Pt.10a
(00)
|
1
|
|
This is the scene where the Antagonise shoots and kills the Facility
Security Guard.
|
3
|
3
|
No
|
There were two main problems with this scene. When the Antagonist
shot the Facility Security Guard he did not perform the recoil of pistol
properly and that he blinked and slightly jumped when he pulled the trigger.
Secondly the Facility Security Guard did not properly act when he got shot as
he was not facing the gun and that he did not fall down correctly.
|
1B
Pt.10b
(00)
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
3
|
No
|
Take 2 of this scene was practically the same as take 1. This time
the Antagonist was standing to close to the Facility Security Guard and that
he did not perform the recoil of the gun correctly. Again the Facility
Security Guard did not perform his death properly as he just dropped to the
floor. Basically we have to re-film this sequence again.
|
1B
Pt.11a
(00005)
|
1
|
0:04
|
This is when Armendariz responds to Zharkov after killing the
Facility Security Guard.
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
The audio and the mise en scene was the most effective elements in
this scene but the antagonist who was holding the gun kept moving it and was
pointing it in the which made the
scene look quite unrealistic and unprofessional.
|
1B
Pt.11b
(00009)
|
2
|
0:03
|
|
2
|
3
|
Yes
|
This take was much better as it clearly showed the perspective of the
antagonist after killing the Facility Security Guard and this time he was
pointing the gun in front of him keeping it still accurately which was
effective when the hit man was talking directly to him. Again this perfectly
showed the personality of the hit man which suited the theme as presented
from the mise en scene.
|
1B
Pt.12a
(00013)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This is when Zharkov responds to the comment of Armendariz relating
to the preparation of the computer mainframe.
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
The scene was professionally established at
focusing on the perspective of Zharkov and the mise en scene. However the
character was slightly high pitched which did not suit the personality of the
antagonist accurately.
|
1B
Pt.12b
(00015)
|
2
|
0:05
|
|
1
|
1
|
Yes
|
This take was perfectly executed as not only it focused on the
perspective of Zharkov it was a good introduction to his dialogue which
presented his personality with a darker voice tone which suited the theme of
the sequence.
|
1B
Pt.13a
(00017)
|
1
|
0:10
|
This was when Zharkov walks towards the computer console and places
his gun on the desk whilst Armendariz was speaking to him
|
1
|
1
|
Yes
|
This scene was accurately filmed as the pan followed the movements of
Zharkov when he was walking towards the console to drop his gun which made
the scene look dramatic when he was using interactive body gestures. This
scene also looked effective when the Hit man was talking to Zharkov which
sounded understandable.
|
1B
Pt.13b
(00019)
|
2
|
0:10
|
|
2
|
3
|
No
|
This scene was not accurately performed as Armendariz said his lines
too late and which made it look like the movements of Zharkov were delayed
which made the scene look quite unprofessional.
|
1B
Pt.13c
(00020)
|
3
|
0:06
|
|
2
|
3
|
No
|
This was the same as the second take where this time there was
problems with the audio of the beginning at the portraying of the characters
looked like it was rushed.
|
1B
Pt.14a
(00021)
|
1
|
0:04
|
This was a CU of Zharkov placing his pistol on the desk beside the
console. However this was an additional sequence which we may or not include
in the crime drama.
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene looked quite effective as it showed the weapon that the antagonist
used which expressed his perspective and his personality which went well with
the mise en scene that related towards the genre of the programme.
|
1B
Pt.14b
(00022)
|
2
|
0:04
|
|
3
|
2
|
No
|
This scene resembles the cinematic characteristics of the first take
but it looked like it was rushed as the antagonist dropped the gun of the
desk to quickly which made unprofessional.
|
1B
Pt.15a
(00026)
|
1
|
0:07
|
This is when Zharkov makes his remark relating towards his
cyber-criminal operation and then begins to hack the computer console to gain
access to the satellite weapon.
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was professionally filmed as it showed the perspective of
the Antagonist making his remark and then hacking the computer which was
effective as he managed to say the line in a dark tone representing his evil
side. The scene also showed the character of Armendariz when he was receiving
the comment made by Zharkov.
|
1B
Pt.15b
(00028)
|
2
|
0:09
|
|
2
|
3
|
No
|
This scene was similar to the first take as it was professional
filmed which presented the perspective of the characters and their actions.
However the only problem in this scene was that the voice tone of Zharkov
sounded sarcastic which made his character look soft and did not suit the
personality of the villain
|
1B
Pt.16a
(00183)
|
1
|
0:04
|
This was the first shot/angle of Zharkov using the computer to hack
in to the satellite weapon
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was professionally accomplished as it showed a MS of
Zharkov hacking the computer which presented his villainous character along
with the perspective of Armendariz. The mise en scene and the sounds of the
machinery also made the sequence quite dramatic
|
1B
Pt.16b
(00185)
|
2
|
0:04
|
|
2
|
3
|
No
|
This scene was very much like the first take but the background noise
of the camera interfered with the ending making it not usable.
|
1B
Pt.17
(00186)
|
1
|
0:04
|
This is second shot/ angle of Zharkov using the computer to hack in
to the satellite weapon
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This was the only take we did as it was filmed professionally the
first time where the sequence was filmed in a MCU which showed the pure evil
perspective of the Antagonist hacking in to the computer which represented
his villainous side which perfectly blended with the mise en scene with
Armendariz overlooking.
|
1B
Pt.18a
(00187)
|
1
|
0:07
|
This is when Zharkov completed the stage of gaining access to the
satellite weapon and then gives Armendariz an order to call the helicopter
and assemble the team
|
1
|
1
|
Yes
|
This was brilliant scene we filmed as it had dramatic and realistic
cinematic features from the shot/ angle it was filmed, the mise en scene of
the room and how the characters were portrayed. Zharkov had a great serious
dark voice tone which illustrated his personality as well as his actions at
hacking the computer. Armendariz also had a dark character of the way he was
interacting and responding to the order received to him from Zharkov.
|
1B
Pt.18b
(00188)
|
2
|
0:06
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This basically had the same filming and character portraying
characteristics than the first take. The only problem was that Zharkov
sounded less serious and was quite rushed which did not represent his
villainous personality.
|
1B
Pt.18c
(00189)
|
3
|
0:05
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
The elements of this sequences was practically similar to the second
take which was definitely not usable.
|
1B
Pt.19a
(00190)
|
1
|
0:09
|
This is when Zharkov gives Armendariz a second order.
|
1
|
1
|
Yes
|
This scene was filmed the first time outstandingly where the camera
shot/ angle was effective as it was filmed in a MCU which showed the
perspective of the two characters perfectly. The body language and the
dialogue of Zharkov was serious and dark which illustrated his personality
and the actions of Armendariz was also compelling which made the sequence
dramatic along with the mise en scene.
|
1B
Pt.19b
(00197)
|
2
|
0:08
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene has the similar cinematic characterises to the first take
but the only problem was that the camera position was incorrect as it was to
close towards the back of Zharkov only showing a small portion of the two
characters in the scene.
|
1B
Pt.19c
(00198)
|
3
|
0:08
|
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene was just like the second take where this time the dialogue
of Zharkov was rushed which did not represent his villainous character.
|
1B
Pt.20a
(00201)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This is when Armendariz uses his smart phone to call in the
helicopter.
|
2
|
3
|
No
|
The filming and the cinematic were excellent as it the camera was in
a MCU shot/ angle and followed the movements of Armendariz whilst panning.
The body language and the actions of the hit man were perfect but the
dialogue of the individual was not effective which did not represent his
personality correctly.
|
1B
Pt.20b
(00202)
|
2
|
0:05
|
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
The filming and cinematic features were exactly the same as the
second take which was brilliant. The body language and movements of Armendariz
were much better and his dialogue was serious which illustrated his character
and made the scene dramatic than before.
|
1B
Pt.21
(00213)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This is when Armendariz uses his smart phone to assemble the team
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was the only scene that we managed to film correctly where
it was filmed in a MCU shot/ angle which focused on the perspective of the
hit man along with the mise en scene in the background. The scene was also
effective as the dialogue of Armendariz sounded serious which illustrated his
character as a close associate to Zharkov.
|
1B
Pt.22a
(00215)
|
1
|
0:04
|
This is when Armendariz conceals his smart phone and turns around to
inform Zharkov about the helicopter’s arrival.
|
2
|
2
|
No
|
This scene was filmed in the correct position but unfortunately
Armendariz was looking straight at the camera which did not make the scene
look realistic.
|
1B
Pt.22b
(00216)
|
2
|
0:04
|
|
1
|
1
|
Yes
|
This scene was a major improvement as it was filmed in a MCU shot/
angle which focused on the movements and perspective of Armendariz which made
the scene look realistic and that his voice was serious which highlighted his
personality which made the scene look dramatic.
|
1B
Pt.23a
(00221) (2)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This was when Zharkov responds to Armendariz and orders him to
collect the suitcase.
|
1
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene was the only decent one as it was filmed in a MCU
shot/angle which focused on his perspective which was quite effective against
the mise en scene background. The voice of the Antagonist was dark and
serious which reflected to his villainous character along with his body
language.
|
1B
Pt.24
(00223)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This is when Armendariz picks up the suitcase from the desk
containing the on-board computer
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This was only take as it was quite effective where it was filmed in a
CU shot/angle which showed the suitcase in full view and presented the
perspective of Armendariz collecting the suitcase which made the sequence
look dramatic.
|
1B
Pt.25
(00223)
|
1
|
0:04
|
This is when Armendariz walks towards Zharkov with the suitcase in
his hand
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This was the only take we did which was perfectly established where
it was filmed in LS/MCU shot/ angle which zoomed out and panned smoothly when
following the movements of the character.
|
1B
Pt.26a
(00226)
|
1
|
0:06
|
This is the final scene of scene 1B which shows Zharkov and
Armendariz leaving the Government military facility after hacking in to
satellite and taking the on-board computer with them.
|
2
|
1
|
Yes
|
This scene was filmed effectively with precision as it focused on the
perspective of the characters making their final move which concluded scene 1
dramatically which was a good way to include the title of the crime drama
after woods. The body language and the dialogue of Zharkov was excellently
executed as it represent the villain and the movements of Armendariz
highlighted the personality of the character.
|
1B
Pt.26b
(00227)
|
2
|
0:04
|
|
2
|
2
|
Yes
|
This scene had the same filming and cinematic features than the first
take but the only problem was that the dialogue of Zharkov and the movements
of both characters was too quick which made the scene looked like it was
rushed.
|
1B
Pt.26c
(00228)
|
3
|
0:05
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
Again this scene has the same filming and cinematic features than the
other two takes where this time the movements was a much slower approach and
that the dialogue of Zharkov sounded sarcastic which did not represent his
dark and serious character.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment